The process has been notable not only for the major change it represents to the regulation of credit in Australia but for the lack of broad-based consultation and the haste with which the Bill was drafted.
Treasury would be well advised to consult more widely in the next phase of reform, which will consider extending the changes to the small business sector. Otherwise, Canberra runs the risk of developing inappropriate regulations which will hamper the flow of credit into Australia’s business sector and weaken the process of economic recovery.
Although there are issues with the development of the Bill, all members of the credit industry need to be ready to comply with its obligations when it becomes law.
The Bill requires all persons engaging in a credit activity to be licensed or a credit representative of a licensee, unless an exemption applies. Credit activities include being a credit provider, providing various services involving credit contracts, acting as an intermediary or suggesting or helping a person enter into a credit contract, consumer leases, mortgages and guarantees.
A service provider who merely performs the obligations or exercises the rights of a credit provider or mortgagee will require a licence. A number of exemptions will be included in the final Regulations, and industry is awaiting these with much interest.
The Bill requires persons who engage in credit activities to apply to ASIC by 31 December 2009 to be registered (with applications accepted from 1 November 2009). The Senate Economics Committee Report appears to be suggesting a six-month deferral, however it is not yet clear what the Government’s final position on timing will be.
Key steps needed during this period include:
As part of this process, industry should continue to identify issues to make submissions to government on exemptions for certain activities.
The Bill introduces responsible lending obligations for both credit providers and persons who provide credit assistance by suggesting a consumer apply, or helping a consumer apply, for a credit contract or an increase to their credit limit (“credit assistance”).
Credit providers and persons providing credit assistance must undertake an assessment of “unsuitability” before a consumer enters into a credit contract or a credit limit is increased and before providing the consumer with assistance to do so. If requested, the customer must be given a copy of the assessment and this obligation continues for 7 years.
The level of enquiry required by the Bill is limited by making “reasonable enquiries” of the consumer including the consumer’s purpose and objectives as well as their financial situation. “Reasonable steps” then need to be taken to verify this information.
On 2 September ASIC released a consultation paper setting out its proposals for guidance on these obligations, and seeking comment by 30 September. It contemplates not only consideration of financial information going to capacity, but also unsuitability given how the consumer proposes to use the money, whether the consumer seeks and understands the implications of various product features, and flexibility.
Licensees will need to consider carefully how to comply with these new rules - and document compliance - for different types of products, customers and channels.
Further changes now proposed to be implemented on 1 July 2010 (previously to be introduced on 1 January 2010) include:
These will involve changes to documentation, but also to systems and procedures, which will impact the timeframes for implementation.
Despite the streamlined timelines initially announced by the Federal Government, still no legislation has been enacted and the Bill remains in the Senate. Final regulations have not yet been released and ASIC is in the process of releasing consultation papers, with final guidance still to come.
Depending on where the Government lands on its final implementation timeline, there may be a very short turnaround time from when the legislation is passed to the commencement of credit provider obligations. Industry does not have the luxury of waiting for certainty before commencing preparation.
The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) recently released the Final Report of the Task Force on Unregulated Markets and Financial Products (TFUMP), following a Consultation Report in May. The Final Report gives Australia a clear mandate to implement changes in a way which recognises the particular features of market practice in Australia. Read more
The recent Final Report of the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) Technical Committee in respect of the Task Force on Unregulated Markets and Financial Products (TFUMP) makes for encouraging reading at a time when it can be very difficult to find a positive word said about the CDS market. Read more
The US Treasury Department has delivered draft legislative language to Capitol Hill with proposals on regulating the “over-the-counter” (OTC) derivatives industry in the United States. These proposals have attracted significant comment in the US, not in the least because of their breadth and apparent novelty. However, all but one of the fundamental principles of these new US regulatory proposals are unlikely to surprise market participants already familiar with derivatives regulation in Australia. Read more
The move of market trading supervision from the ASX to ASIC makes a good deal of sense but if the change is to realise its potential benefits for our financial system, then the Government and ASIC will need to keep the end game in sight. Read more
Personal Property Securities reform, set for introduction in May 2011, will be one of the most important legislative reforms to affect the financial services industry for decades. Major changes will be required in the systems, processes, policies, procedures and documentation of financial institutions and others. Read more
On 18 August 2009, the United Kingdom Office of Fair Trading (OFT) released proposed changes to its guidance on director disqualification orders in competition law cases. Currently, a company director can be disqualified from acting as a director for up to 15 years if their company is involved in a contravention of competition law and a Court finds they are unfit to be involved in the management of a company as a result. Read more
The Federal Government's proposed legislation capping termination payments for directors and executives at 1x base salary has been passed by the House of Representatives and recommended by the Senate Economic Committee with only one change. The Bill is being debated in the Senate this week, and could become law within days. Read more