Tell me in 30 seconds
Regulated organisations have been warned to address significant gaps in their cyber security and resilience following ASIC’s latest cyber pulse survey. The results of the survey indicates that many organisation are not cyber mature and are reactive rather than proactive in managing cyber security. To mitigate the risk of regulatory action, organisations should focus on improving their management of supply chain risks, on protecting their confidential information, on developing effective risk governance frameworks and on developing and testing their cyber incident response plans.
Context
In November 2023, the Australian Securities Investment Commission (ASIC) released its report on its most recent cyber pulse survey (the Report). The Report exposed deficiencies in Australian organisations’ cyber security risk management, highlighting a tendency for organisations to adopt a reactive, rather than proactive, approach to managing their cyber security.
In response to the findings, ASIC issued a stern warning, urging regulated organisations to address the “significant gap” in their cyber security and resilience. This is not an isolated warning - ASIC Chair Joe Longo recently stated that the regulator is prepared to take action against directors who fail to adopt adequate measures on the basis that they have not met their fiduciary duty to exercise care and diligence. The regulator has made it clear that effective cyber risk management should be a top priority for boards.
In light of these warnings, the Report offers useful guidance on what is expected of organisations and their leadership in relation to cyber security and cyber resilience. A failure by a regulated organisation to address the matters raised by ASIC in this report could ground an ASIC claim that the directors of the organisation have failed to exercise appropriate care and diligence.
This insight outlines our key lessons for regulated organisations and boards based on the findings in the Report.
Four key lessons
Lesson 1: Actively manage supply chain risks
The vulnerability of organisations to the security weaknesses of third-party vendors has been a focal point of previous ASIC guidance and commentary. It has made it clear that organisations are not doing enough in this space, with 44% of survey respondents indicating that they do not manage supply chain risks.
While some organisations have mature models in place to mitigate third-party risk, the recent surge in high-profile cyber breaches originating from third-party providers should prompt directors to reassess whether they are doing enough to fulfil their duties in this space.
While what is required to discharge one’s duties will depend on the particular organisational circumstances, boards should ensure their organisations consider the following to ensure they are taking reasonable actions to manage supply chain risk:
|
Risk assessment and due diligence
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual agreements
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring and auditing
|
|
|
|
|
Scenario planning
|
|
|
|
Lesson 2: Protect and encrypt confidential information
Data is increasingly recognised as the most valuable and complex asset held by organisations. Alarmingly, a substantial two-thirds of survey respondents admitted to having limited or no capacity to protect their confidential information. Inadequate data strategies have given rise to greater data-related risk for organisations. Despite the ongoing accumulation of large volumes of data, organisations struggle to implement robust encryption measures for newly acquired data and often overlook the essential process of reviewing and deleting outdated legacy data when required. In many cases, boards lack adequate oversight of what data their organisation holds, and the risks associated with that retention. This is a concern echoed by the Federal Government’s discussion paper to the 2023-30 Cyber Strategy, which emphasised the need for stronger practices to protect the widespread collection of customer data.
While implementing effective data protection and retention practices is no easy feat, directors will be expected to establish appropriate oversight of management’s efforts in these areas and ensure that data practices are well-defined, monitored and prioritised. In particular, organisations should consider matters including the following to protect their data:
|
Data encryption
|
|
|
|
|
Prevent unauthorised transmission
|
|
|
|
|
Data destruction management
|
|
|
|
Lesson 3: Develop effective risk governance frameworks using cyber security strategies
While directors may not need to have an in-depth understanding of complex digital subjects, being properly advised, and understanding their organisation’s key cyber risks is critical. ASIC’s survey results revealed that some organisations are not doing enough to develop their risk frameworks, with 20% of organisations yet to adopt a cyber security standard. The responsibility for ensuring that an organisation designs, implements and monitors an effective cyber strategy and risk governance framework ultimately lies with the board.
Cybersecurity standards and frameworks are available to assist organisations to develop risk frameworks that identify, manage and mitigate cyber risks. However, it is not enough to have a plan in place; they must be tested regularly alongside ongoing reassessments of cyber security risks. In line with these principles, organisations should consider the following good practice recommendations:
|
Develop cyber strategies and risk governance frameworks
|
|
|
|
|
Adopt cyber security standard
|
|
|
|
|
Understand risk environment
|
|
|
|
|
Ongoing monitoring
|
|
|
|
Lesson 4: Develop, implement and test cyber incident response plans
Central to any effective cyber risk framework is a comprehensive incident response plan capable of addressing both current and future risks. Of the organisations surveyed, 33% did not have a cyber incident response plan, and 35% failed to regularly test their existing plans. It falls upon senior management to develop, implement, and monitor an organisation's incident response plan. Within this plan, roles and responsibilities for management, IT, legal, compliance, and the board must be clearly defined to ensure a coordinated and effective response to cyber threats. Organisations should consider the following matters in relation to their cyber incident response plan:
|
Leadership and sponsorship
|
|
|
|
|
Incident classification
|
|
|
|
|
Incident detention and reporting
|
|
|
|
|
Incident response plan testing
|
|
|
|

